Scaling out knowledge system infrastructure for sustainability transformations
Are we practicing what we preach? Place-based publications: a provocation and proposal. Embracing Place-Based Knowledge for Sustainability Transformations
By: Samuel Wearne
Abstract:
In his insightful article, Samuel Wearne critiques the current academic publishing model in sustainability science, highlighting its limitations in fostering transformative, contextually nuanced, and democratically engaged sustainability practices. He proposes a shift towards regionally scaled, place-based publications as a strategic intervention to empower diverse and localized knowledge systems.
Introduction:
Wearne's article, stemming from discussions at the 2017 Transformations to Sustainability Conference, addresses the growing discontent with the dominant knowledge systems in sustainability science. He argues that these systems, often characterized by a preference for abstract, universal knowledge, marginalize local and contextual insights, particularly those from non-Western perspectives.
Key Insights:
Power Dynamics in Publishing: Wearne observes that mainstream academic publishing, with its focus on international, peer-reviewed journals, inherently favors knowledge from the Global North and English-speaking academics. This system perpetuates power imbalances and overlooks the value of diverse, place-based knowledge.
Need for Transformative Innovations: To achieve sustainable futures, Wearne suggests that transformative innovations in academic practices, particularly publishing, are crucial. He questions whether current practices truly reflect the transformative changes advocated in sustainability science.
Proposal for Regional Publications: Wearne proposes the development of regionally scaled, place-based publications. These journals would focus on research and policies pertinent to specific regions, encouraging a more democratic and inclusive approach to knowledge co-production.
Discussion:
Local Transformative Impact: Wearne envisions these regional journals as platforms for various stakeholders to engage in transdisciplinary research relevant to their locales. This approach could influence local governance and policy-making, enhancing community participation and knowledge exchange.
Systemic Transformation: On a broader scale, a network of regional publications could contribute to a more diverse and resilient global knowledge system. This diversity would enrich comparative research and support more contextually relevant sustainability practices.
Challenges and Considerations: Wearne acknowledges potential risks, such as the co-optation of alternative knowledge systems and the need for these publications to be genuinely impactful and consistent with their transformative aspirations.
Conclusion:
Wearne's article is a provocative call to action for the academic community, particularly in sustainability science. It challenges existing publishing norms and advocates for a systemic shift towards place-based publications. This approach, he argues, could align academic practices more closely with the principles of sustainability transformations, fostering a more equitable and contextually responsive knowledge system.
